Posted November 22, 2019
________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________
John Sudworth, BBC News, 20 November 2019
□
A former employee of the UK’s Hong Kong consulate has told the BBC that he was tortured in China and accused of inciting political unrest in the city.
Simon Cheng, a Hong Kong citizen who worked for the UK government for almost two years, was deterred for 15 days on a trip to mainland China in August.
“I was shackled, blindfolded and hooded,” the 29-year-old tells me.
UK government sources say they believe his claims –of being beaten and forced to sign confessions– are credible.
Following our interview, the British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab summoned the Chinese ambassador.
“We are outraged by the disgraceful mistreatment that Mr Cheng faced when he was in detention in mainland China … and we’ve made clear that we expect the Chinese authorities to review and hold to account those responsible,” Mr Raab told the BBC.
But on Wednesday [20 November] a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson told the BBC they “absolutely cannot accept the UK government’s interference in this case” –and would in return summon the UK ambassador to “express opposition and anger”.
“We hope the UK will be prudent and stop interfering in Hong Kong and in China’s domestic affairs because it will, eventually, only harm the UK’s own interests,” the spokesperson added.
…
The claims he makes –including that he saw other Hongkongers in Chinese custody– are likely to fuel protestors fears that their city’s freedoms are being eroded under Chinese rule.
“They said they work for the secret service and that there are no human rights,” he tells me “Then they started to torture.”
…
As a trade and investment officer at the UK consulate, Simon Cheng’s particular brief was to drum up interest in investing in Scotland among the Chinese business community.
…
Questions [from China’s National Security Police] focused on his involvement in protests with the aim, he says, of forcing him to confess to fomenting unrest [in Hong Koon behalf of the British state. … He says he was made to hold stress positions –squatting against a wall for hours on end, and beaten if he moved. … He claims he was subjected to sleep deprivation, with his interrogators forcing him to sing the Chinese national anthem to keep himself awake.
________________________________________
There is no longer a gap between business and culture or military and civilian life.
— Marshall McLuhan (1969)
________________________________________
________________________________________

” … ‘Near Future’ …”. (Photo: M. Cynog Evan’s, 2019.)
●
So far as physical conditions are concerned, there seems to be no good reason why life, including human life, should not continue for many million years. The danger comes, not from man’s physical or biological environment, but from himself. He has survived, hitherto, through ignorance. Can he continue to survive now that the useful degree of ignorance is lost?
— Bertrand Russell (1962)
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________

________________________________________
ON THE CRITICAL ATTITUDE
Bertolt Brecht
(c. 1938)
The critical attitude
Strikes many people as unfruitful
That is because they find the state
Impervious to their criticism
But what in this case is an unfruitful attitude
Is merely a feeble attitude. Give criticism arms
And states can be demolished by it.
Canalising a river
Grafting a fruit tree
Educating a person
Transforming a state
These are instances of fruitful criticism
And at the same time instances of art.
________________________________________
________________________________________
Question: How many kinds of correctness are there?
Answer: … The first is correctness in substance and the second is correctness in function. Correctness in substance means that it is neither absolute nor worldly, and correctness in function means being both absolute and worldly.
— Chi-tsang (549-623)
________________________________________
________________________________________